MAPS' website offers updated information about efforts to develop MDMA
into a prescription medicine.
and read updates in the MAPS media section
MAPS' website also offers links to harm reduction information, ecstasy pill-testing results and pill submission information.
October 17, 2002. A Surprising New Issue. After reviewing MAPS'
letter, Dr. James Baldwin of the WIRB informed RIck Doblin that the
October 30 meeting was canceled, but not for the reasons MAPS had hoped.
Dr. James Baldwin said that the meeting was "premature" because the WIRB
now needed to convene its Executive Policy Committee (EPC) to discuss
whether the WIRB should be involved with research with Schedule I drugs.
The next EPC meeting is scheduled for November 19. The WIRB is no
longer reviewing the protocol based on the science but on
non-scientific, internal policy issues, not a very encouraging
development.
October 11, 2002. A Comprehensive, Strong Response. MAPS
submitted a lengthy written response to the WIRB letter, along with 14
letters of information and support from MDMA scientists around the
world. MAPS' letter addressed every point raised in the WIRB letter and
was so solid that we thought perhaps the WIRB would conclude that the
October 30 meeting was not necessary.
October 3, 2002. A Glimmer of Hope. Rick Doblin speaks with
James Baldwin, Ph.D., Executive Director of the WIRB. Dr. Baldwin
apologized for the tone of the WIRB letter and seemed to view favorably
MAPS' arguments. He was informed that the one scientist whom the WIRB
letter claimed was against the study was actually in favor of the study
(subject to two conditions that MAPS could easily agree with), that the
second scientist cited in the WIRB letter was strongly in favor of the
study, and that the third scientist was probably not fully informed
about the details of the protocol and was neither opposed to or in favor
of the study. Dr. Baldwin tentatively scheduled a meeting between Rick
Doblin and Michael Mithoefer and the WIRB for October 30, in Olympia,
Washington.
September 27, 2002. Outrageous News. Dr. George
Ricaurte publishes an article in Science reporting on primate data that
he claims suggests that even one night's recreational use of Ecstasy can
lead to Parkinson's. This government-funded research, which ignored
the high mortality rate of the test animals and directly contradictory
human data, is a classic example of risk amplification and the
demonization of illegal drugs. MAPS obtained a copy of this article
before publication and responded by sending out
our first press release ever. MAPS' critique was favorably
reported in articles in the New York Times and Washington Post and
elsewhere. MAPS has also written a letter to
the editor of Science.
September 6, 2002. Terrible News. The Western IRB, which approved the
MDMA/PTSD protocol on July 10, informed us by letter that approval was
withdrawn. The revocation was based on secondhand reports of conversations
(not on data!) that a WIRB staff person had with three MDMA researchers. The
WIRB letter was written in a surprisingly insulting manner and contained
numerous mistakes. MAPS was not informed that the protocol was being
reevaluated and did not have an opportunity to respond to the reports by the
WIRB staff person, who didn't like the fact that the WIRB had approved the
protocol.
July 17, 2002. Tremendous news. On July 10, we received word that the
Institutional Review Board (IRB) had approved MAPS' MDMA/PTSD study! We can
now definitely say that the US study will take place. Dr. Michael Mithoefer
still needs to obtain his DEA Schedule 1 license, which should take about 4-6
weeks, but this is just a matter of time
There is now an excellent chance that the Israeli Ministry of Health will
approve an Israeli MDMA/PTSD study. Michael and I are tentatively planning to
go there in late Sept. or early Oct. for a one-day seminar organized by the
Ministry to discuss the latest findings in MDMA research, and protocol design
options for the Israeli study.
Here are the financial implications:
We still need to raise an additional $60,000 for the US MDMA/PTSD study and
another $60,000 for the Israeli study. MAPS is also seeking $10,000 for our
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant application for support for
the development of a treatment manual that describes in detail hw
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD should be conducted and provides
specific ways to evaluate whether the therapy technique itself is being
delivered appropriately. We are also seeking $20,000 for our ongoing MDMA
literature review. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
June 19, 2002. MDMA/PTSD protocol submitted to the Western Institutional
Review Board (WIRB). Review expected to take 3-5 weeks.
June 14, 2002. FDA gives final approval to conduct the treatment sessions in Dr. Michael Mithoefer's office, with a "crash cart" and an Emergency Room
doctor and nurse in the next room in case they are needed.
May 14, 2002. Conference call with Dr. Mithoefer, Rick Doblin and FDA o
fficials, in which we come to tentative agreement to conduct the study in Dr.
Mithoefer's office, as long as we hire both an ER doctor and nurse to sit in
the room.
May 10, 2002. FDA rejects our request, primarily saying that they would like a larger emergency response team.
March 14, 2002. Request submitted to FDA to change the location of the
treatment sessions from the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) to
Dr. Mithoefer's office. We propose renting a "crash cart" and hiring an
emergency room nurse to be on site in the room next to the treatment room for
the first five hours of each session, in case Dr. Michael Mithoefer and Annie
Mithoefer, R.N. need help responding to an adverse event.
November 28, 2001. The fourth patient in the Spain MDMA/PTSD dose-response study was treated on November 28, 2001. We have now completed the 50 mgs dose group (3 patients received 50 mgs and 1 received a placebo). The next dose level is 75 mgs (5 patients will receive 75 mgs and 2 will receive a
placebo).
November 2, 2001. It's my pleasure to report some excellent news. About 10 AM, Friday, November 2, FDA contacted me to say that MAPS' MDMA/PTSD protocol was approved. This approval marks the culmination of 16 years of efforts to obtain permission from FDA for MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
research, since MDMA was criminalized in 1985. This approval also marks the
beginning of what I hope will be a $5 million, 5-year project to develop MDMA
into a prescription medicine.
On Wednesday, Dr. Michael Mithoefer, the principal investigator, and I had a
conference call with FDA during which we discussed various design issues. The
conference call was calm, serious and respectful. We agreed to make several
design changes, mainly closer monitoring of blood pressure and omitting the
opportunity for placebo subjects who still met inclusion criteria for PTSD at
the final evaluation to enroll in an open label extension study during which
they would receive MDMA. We argued against several other possible changes,
mainly the idea that patients should be required to have had prior experience
with MDMA. On Thursday, I faxed an addendum specifying the changes we had
agreed upon and the places where the protocol needed to be changed. Last
night, I saw on CNN that anthrax was discovered in the FDA mailroom at
Rockville, where the FDA officials reviewing the protocol work. Today, FDA
officials were still at work and informed me that the protocol was approved
without the need for any additional changes.
Of course, we still need to obtain Institutional Review Board approval from
the Medical University of South Carolina. This should take several additional
months.
I've already let the Israeli Ministry of Health know that the FDA approved
the study. According to Dr. Moshe Kotler, the principal investigator of the
proposed Israeli MDMA/PTSD protocol, FDA approval was need for an MDMA/PTSD
study before he would feel comfortable submitting a protocol to the Ministry.
The subjects in the ongoing Spain MDMA/PTSD study are women survivors of
sexual assault with chronic PTSD. The subjects in the FDA-approved study are
women and men survivors of criminal assault with chronic PTSD. The Israeli
study will hopefully include subjects whose PTSD was the result of war and
terrorism.
The formal approval letter from FDA will arrive next week. -- Rick Doblin, Ph.D.
October 1, 2001. MAPS submitted to the FDA today the protocol for Dr. Michael
Mithoefer and Dr. Mark Wagner's MAPS-supported pilot study into the use of
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in the treatment of patients who have experienced
criminal victimization and as a result have suffered from chronic,
treatment-resistance posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The submission of
this protocol to FDA marks a major milestone in the history of MAPS, and
hopefully in the history of MDMA research. FDA has 30 days to respond to the
protocol. We fully expect FDA eventually to approve the study in some form.
(Faster download - without individual case reports from Phase 1 study; longer version - with individual case reports from Phase 1 study)
July 18, 2001. As part of its submission to FDA of a protocol designed to
study the use of MDMA in the treatment of PTSD, MAPS' commissioned an
extensive review of the scientific literature on MDMA. This literature review was developed under the direction of Matt Baggott with Ilsa Jerome, Ph.D., and is now being made available to regulatory agencies, other researchers and the public. The literature review will be updated on a regular basis as new research is published.
July 16, 2001. A draft of the MDMA/PTSD
protocol that MAPS has been working for 2 years to develop, with Dr. Michael
Mithoefer and Mark Wagner, Ph.D., at the Medical University
of South Carolina, has now been posted to the web. The protocol will submitted
to FDA shortly after NIDA's scientific meeting on MDMA, held at the National
Institutes of Health campus in Bethesda, MD, on July 19-20. If and when it
becomes approved in some form, this protocol will be the first FDA-approved
study of the therapeutic use of MDMA since MDMA was placed in Schedule 1 in
1985.
March 19, 2001. The US Sentencing Commission held an open hearing concerning its proposal to increase penalties on MDMA. Testimony about MDMA opposing the increase was presented by Rick Doblin, Ph.D., David Nichols, Ph.D., Charles Grob, M.D., Julie Holland, M.D. and Richard Glen Boire, Esq. Testimony about legal issues by opponents of the increase was presented by Ed Mallet, Executive Director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), Julie Stewart, Executive Director of Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM), and Bill McColl, Legislative Director of The Lindesmith Center/ Drug Policy Foundation (TLC/DPF). The testimony had little effect and the Sentencing Commission recommended substantial increases in penalties. MDMA is now, dose for dose, punished more heavily than heroin.
Judge Diane Murphy, Chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, explained the
rationale behind the Commission's recommendation during a hearing of the Senate Caucus on International Drug Control on March 21, 2001. (See also visual presentation)
February 3, 2001. MAPS convened a protocol design meeting in San Francisco to
discuss the details of a protocol evaluating the use of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy in the treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The
meeting included. among others, the principle investigator and therapists
of the South Carolina team (Dr. Michael Mithoefer and Annie Mithoefer, RN),
the MAPS team that has for the last year and a half been reviewing the MDMA
literature for submission to FDA (Matt Baggott, Ilsa Jerome), the team that
has been creating the MDMA bibliography of all scientific papers on MDMA
published in peer-reviewed journals (from erowid.org), and scientific
consultants including Dr. Charles Grob, Dr. George Greer, and Dr. Dave
Nichols. The meeting was quite productive, with the protocol expected to be
submitted to FDA in April 2001.
November 9, 2000. The first patient was treated in the
MAPS-supported MDMA/PTSD study being conducted in Madrid, Spain, under the
director of José Carlos Bouso, Ph.D. candidate. José Carlos and
Marcela
Ot'alora were the co-therapists. The four hour session went very well and the
patient seemed to have gotten to a deeper, more therapeutic level. Of
course, we won't know for some time whether the patient received a dose of 50
mgs or a placebo! What we do know is that study is off to a great start.
Read more about
this study, including the protocol and informed consent form.
November 1, 2000. Journal of the American
Medical Association (JAMA) letter
reports on the DanceSafe/MAPS pill testing program (the letter says people
paid for their own testing but that was a mistake. MAPS paid for most of the
testing of these pills).
August 15, 2000. A discussion about "Raves, Ecstasy and Youth" was held
at the Shadow Convention 2000 in Los Angeles. A celebrity panel of MDMA
researchers, experts and psychonauts was assembled by the Lindesmith
Center/Drug Policy Foundation; video and audio coverage of this unique event
can be found at the Shadow
Conventions 2000 website.
May 5-6, 2000. The California Association of Toxicologists held a conference in
North Hollywood, California, the first day of which was devoted to drugs that are
commonly found at raves. Read summary and comments by
Earth
and Richard G.
Boire.
March 2000 - New York Lindesmith Center.
Hear in
RealAudio MDMA ('Ecstasy') Research: When Science and Politics Collide.
Sound quality is excellent except for the first few minutes, so be patient. Speakers: Julie
Holland, MD, attending psychiatrist, Bellevue Hospital Psychiatric Emergency Room and
faculty, NYU School of Medicine; John P. Morgan, MD, professor of pharmacology, City
College of New York; and Rick Doblin, president, MAPS) and Ph.D. candidate, Kennedy
School of Government, Harvard University, assessed scientific and political efforts to
conduct MDMA research in the US and abroad. See also the
transcript of Holland's talk.
February 2000 - Spain. A pilot study of MDMA therapy in the treatment of PTSD
has been approved and will be the first formal therapy study with MDMA ever conducted.
(Read current
update. MAPS has
pledged $54,000 for this study; we have raised $23,000 and are seeking additional
contributions.
Autumn 1999 - MAPS Israel MDMA Conference. MAPS organized an
international
symposium on the medical utility of MDMA. Talks from this event, held August 31 to
September 1, 1999, are posted on this site (talks by George Greer, Juraj and Sonja Styk and Mark Kleiman). See also
Video clips of some of the talks.
July 24, 1999 - Teleconference with FDA concerning MDMA psychotherapy research to treat anxiety, depression and pain in cancer patients. FDA indicates willingness to approve "proof of principle" study.
A MAPS History of MDMA
MDMA was synthesized in 1912 and patented in Germany by Merck in 1914 but
was not the subject of human
research at that time. In the 1950s it was briefly researched by the U.S. Government as
part of the CIA's and the Army's chemical warfare investigations. It was forgotten until
the middle 1970s when it was rediscovered by the psychedelic therapy community and
began to be used as an adjunct to
psychotherapy by psychiatrists and therapists who were familiar with the field of
psychedelic psychotherapy. MAPS published a book,
The Secret Chief, about the leader of this therapy
community.
In the early 1980s, the drug began to be used non-medically, particularly in Texas, under
the name Ecstasy. Both the non-medical and therapeutic use of MDMA were made illegal in
1985 despite the Drug Enforcement Administration Administrative Law Judge Francis
Young's
recommendation that
physicians be permitted to continue to administer it to their patients.
Rick Doblin, Alise Agar and Debby
Harlow helped coordinate the pro-MDMA contingent in the DEA lawsuit. For an excellent
history of the early use of MDMA, see Pursuit of Ecstasy by Beck and Rosenbaum.
In 1986, with the goal of developing MDMA's therapeutic potential through
FDA-approved protocols, a non-profit organization opened a Drug Master File
for MDMA with data gathered from the standard preclinical animal toxicity
studies required by FDA. Five different applications for permission to
conduct research with MDMA were submitted to FDA between 1986 to 1988, to the
Neuropharmacologic Drug Products Division directed by Dr. Paul Leber. All
five applications were rejected. Three protocols for double-blind
controlled trials were from researchers at, respectively, Harvard Medical
School, UC San Francisco Medical School, and U. of New Mexico Medical School,
and were all rejected. Two applications submitted by individual physicians
were for single case studies, one for a terminal cancer patient who had been
successfully treated for pain with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy prior to the
criminalization of MDMA and the other for a unipolar depression patient for
whom all available treatments had been attempted without success. Both of
these single-patient INDs were also rejected. The FDA based its rationale for
rejecting all protocols and single case studies on the hypothetical risk of
functional consequences of potential neurotoxicity from MDMA Proponents of
MDMA research claimed that the rejection of all efforts to conduct
FDA-approved MDMA research was based not on rational risk/benefit assessments
but on an underlying cultural prejudice against medical research with drugs
that were criminalized and on one or more FDA officials' personal opposition
to human research with psychedelics. Since FDA Review Divisions are sometimes
described as operating like fiefdoms
under the control of their Directors, proponents felt profoundly stymied.
Proponents claimed that concerns about MDMA neurotoxicity, which numerous
studies had failed to link with functional or behavioral consequence and
which in any case had not been clearly demonstrated to occur at all at
therapeutic does levels, were reminiscent of scientific research in the
1960s that claimed to prove that LSD damaged chromosomes. These reports
were effective in generating public disapproval of LSD and in hindering
research but were later determined to have no clinically significant effect.
In 1992, FDA reviewed a MAPS-supported protocol
submitted by Dr. Charles
Grob, then at UC Irvine, for a study of the use of MDMA in the treatment of
pain, anxiety and depression in cancer patients. FDA's Drug Abuse Advisory
Committee recommended that the cancer patient study be postponed and that a
Phase 1 dose-response safety study be conducted first. The protocol was
redesigned, with FDA giving final approval for the Phase 1 safety study on
November 5, 1992. The safety study was completed in 1995. Data from the safety study
revealed no unusual risks and indicated that MDMA could be safely
administered within a clinical research context. Dr. Grob submitted the first
draft of the protocol for the study of cancer patients
in 1997. Negotiations
with FDA moved very slowly, due to initial FDA decisions to put MDMA
psychotherapy research on a slow track to nowhere. However, FDA opposition
eventually lessened as MAPS and Dr. Grob persisted in our efforts to obtain
permission for research into the use of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in cancer
patients.
MAPS and MDMA Research
Back to Top
Doblin founded MAPS in 1986 when it became clear that only through FDA-approved
research would MDMA ever become legal again. After years of effort, the first FDA-
approved research with MDMA was finally approved in 1992 under the direction of
Dr. Charles Grob, Harbor-UCLA.
MDMA is off-patent and is considered to be an
Orphan Drug, meaning that the
pharmaceutical industry sees no financial incentives in conducting research with it. As a
result
of the non-medical use of MDMA, funding from government agencies for studies into the
beneficial uses of MDMA have not been obtainable. MAPS has been working to support
MDMA research since 1986 and opened a Drug Master File for MDMA at the FDA. Opening
a Drug Master File is a required step for any drug before it can be legitimately researched
in the U.S. MAPS
has spent over $170,000 on MDMA research since 1986 and has supported FDA-required
animal toxicity studies at the University of Arkansas and Stanford (1986-1988), human
safety studies at Stanford and Johns Hopkins (1988-1991), and Dr. Charles Grob's
FDA-approved Phase 1 study into the physiological and psychological effects of
MDMA in humans (1992-1995).
Most recently MAPS granted $6,000 to the
Psychiatric University Hospital in
Zürich
for a PET scan study of MDMA-naive subjects and $10,000 for the publication of papers on
EEG and prepulse inhibition in ecstasy users. Since 1986, MAPS' primary research goal
has
been a therapy study in cancer patients.
MDMA with Cancer Patients - U.S. Research
Back to Top
The proposed study of MDMA psychotherapy in the treatment of
cancer patients (Harbor UCLA Hospital) will be the first
investigation of the therapeutic
potential of MDMA ever conducted in the U.S. We have assembled an excellent team of
scientific advisors including Dr. Lester Grinspoon of Harvard Medical School, Dr. Carl
Simonton, the developer of the
Simonton method of treating the psychological aspects of cancer, and Dr. Jeanne
Achterberg, an advisor on guided imagery to the National Institutes of Health's
Office of Alternative Medicine, the senior editor of the Journal of Alternative Therapies,
and the past president of the Association for Transpersonal Psychology.
The rationale for the proposed study is based in
part on numerous remarkable
anecdotal
accounts of the therapeutic use of MDMA in the treatment of cancer patients. An
excellent
description of the effect of MDMA is that it "reduces the fear response to a perceived
emotional threat." MDMA promotes feelings of peacefulness and acceptance that
enable people to move through denial and defense in order to respond clearly to difficult
realities and to experience complex emotions.
Clinical case reports suggest that MDMA can reduce acute and chronic pain
experienced by end-stage cancer patients, perhaps that portion of total pain and suffering
resulting from emotional, psychological, cognitive, and social variables. In one case
reported by Greer, the debilitating pain associated with multiple myeloma was
significantly alleviated during an MDMA session in which the patient practiced
visualization techniques for pain control. A dramatic reduction in pain persisted for
several months following the MDMA session. To date, no scientific studies have been
attempted to evaluate the safety, efficacy or mechanism of action of MDMA as an adjunct to
the reduction of pain in end-stage cancer patients, as a treatment of anxiety and
depression, or as a tool to facilitate psychologically-mediated stimulation of the immune
system.
FDA-approved research in the US
The only three FDA-approved studies where researchers have administered MDMA to human subjects have been "Psychobiologic Effects of MDMA in Humans" at Harbor-UCLA, "MDMA Pharmacokinetics in Humans" at UCSF, and "Serotonin and Dopamine system interactions in the reinforcing properties of psychostimulants" at Wayne State University.
See our psychedelic research list MDMA section for current updates about these three studies.
MDMA Research in other countries
MAPS is currently supporting the efforts of researchers in
Switzerland,
Israel and
Spain.
The proposed studies in Spain and Israel are for MDMA psychotherapy in the treatment of
post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MAPS tried to start MDMA/PTSD research in
Nicaragua from 1993 to 1995. When it
became clear that research in that country would not be sufficiently rigorous, MAPS
abandoned the effort.
Accounts of Healing
Looking at the Risks
Families Who Value MDMA
Resources on this site
Resources on other sites
Back to Top